Tag Archive for 'Politics'

Forest Service Buyout

Wild Wilderness is sounding the alarm about a new US Forest Service proposal that would grant preferred National Forest access to outfitters, guides, and non-profits. If this proposal is approved, it would have sweeping and potentially permanent effects on all Forest Service Lands — which is the vast majority of outdoorsy-havens around Los Angeles, by the way.

Their site has a good summary of a potential future:

* Outfitters and guides would be able to pay a small fee for sole and exclusive access to prime camping, hunting, fishing and picnic areas, including boat launch ramps.

* Outfitters, guides and non-profit organizations would be awarded an allocation of public use for ten-year periods. Commonly referred to as a “taking,” of public land the rule would give preferred access to the outfitters at the expense of the do-it-yourself public on all Forest Service-managed lands.

* This rulemaking would force allocating access in management areas where access is presently allocation-free, as it now is at Boundary Waters Canoe Area and the Deschutes River.

* Outfitters, Guides and non-profits become “Priority Users”. The public, who does not use outfitters, guides or non-profits for access would no longer have “priority use.”

* The general public would no longer be able to comment on USFS giving away blocks of access to Forest Service land. Outfitting and guiding in designated wilderness would not require public comment and review through an Environmental Assessment or Environmental Impact Statement. Additionally, there is no provision to prevent outfitting services from selling their preferred access rights to their successor companies.

* The new proposed rules do not protect wilderness areas from commercialization.

Not all doom and gloom, WildWilderness also has helpful links for ways you can submit a comment on this action, either in writing or online. They suggest you CC your Senator or Representative, too.

Remember all comments have to be received by January 17th, 2008. If you do anything outside on National Forest land, from hiking to mountaineering to horseback riding to shooting, this affects you.

Live Earth

Today is 07-07-07. For some, a lucky day to pick up a lottery ticket. For others, a good day to stage a worldwide concert event on all of the 7 continents to raise awareness about the climate crisis.

On the Live Earth web site, you can stream live footage from all of the world’s concerts, as well as watch some educational shorts and read up on how minor changes over large groups of people can have an enormous effect. The traditional ‘get involved’ section of the site is all about promising to change a few bulbs to CFLs, shopping for energy efficient appliances, and making sure everything is turned off when you leave your apartment or house. Really, all stuff we should be doing anyway.

So if you’ve got some time today, check out one of the webcasts, learn up on some practical ways to green your life, and sign the Live Earth Pledge, which demands our government start taking this issue seriously, and asks us to look for ways to help as individuals, too.

At the very least, try to check out the band from Antarctica - Nunatak. If there’s something I can get behind more than a worldwide concert for climate change, it’s a band playing outside a sub-zero research station composed entirely of scientists.

Green Politicians

With the Democratic and Republican Presidential hopefuls gearing up their campaigns, politics are on a lot of peoples’ minds. Lucky for us, Grist has an excellent list of 15 of the globe’s best green politicians (with 4 additional runners-up), so should you happen to find yourself living in one of these areas, you have a better idea of who to vote for to clean your green conscience.

I’m happy to know two of the top 15 (and one runner up, to boot) represent me in various levels of government — but California’s already got a good rep as a pro-environment state. More surprising are inclusions like the mayor of red-state capital Salt Lake City and the leader of the British Conservative Party … and then there’s Helen Clark, the Prime Minister of New Zealand, who wants to make her country the first completely carbon neutral nation on the planet.

Talk about ambitious…

Candidate Comparison

Because it’s never too early to start getting informed, here are two comparisons of both parties’ candidates’ positions on various environmental topics - from carbon caps to fuel efficiency to alternative energy. Even though it’s still very early in the campaign, some of the answers may surprise you.

… and it’s always nice to know where your guy (or gal) stands.

From the League of Conservation Voters.

From NPR.

Via TerraBlog.

Gubernatorial Sass

I love it when Governors get all antsy and start suing the federal government. It’s a great way for the states to call b-s on Washington, and usually good things come out of it - like the Clean Air Act and seatbelts and other warm fuzzies. I love it even more when the executives doing it are my former and current heads of state.

In a letter to the Washington Post, Gov. Jodi Rell (R-CT) and Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger (R-CA), accused the feds of “inaction and denial” on global warming. My current and former home states - along with ten others - want to go above and beyond the EPA’s vehicle emissions standards, but they need an OK from the EPA to do so. Since California’s request 16 months ago, they’ve heard nothing.

In vaguely-threatening, finger-wagging language, the pair wrote, “it’s high time the federal government becomes our partner or gets out of the way.”

Nice.

RAT Poison

This week, the California Assembly passed the attractively named Assembly Joint Resolution 21, which would ask Washington, D.C. to repeal the 2004 law that authorized entrance and use fees for federal land. The bill now moves to the California Senate. Similar resolutions have already passed in other Western states, like Idaho, Colorado, Montana, Oregon, and halfway through Alaska (still has to get ratified by Alaskan Senate).

John Karevoll, of the Western Slope No Fee Coalition, said:

If I drive my son to a basketball game at our high school and pull to the side of the road to check out the view, I can be ticketed, ultimately fined $5,000 or get six months jail. We’re not talking about a developed scenic turnout, just the side of State Highway 18. So the Adventure Pass is clearly a barrier, it keeps people away. I can tell you that forest visitation has dropped the past few years despite the Inland Empire’s growth. In fact, half the time I see nobody. Even on major holidays.

I think these guys are on the right side, but there’s more than a fair share of hyperbole in that statement. You’d have to catch a ranger on a very bad day to get a $5000 fine for pulling over on the side of the road. And these passes are by no means expensive. Here in the Angeles, Cleveland, or Los Padres National Forests, a day use pass will run you five bucks. If you’re caught without one, you even have the option to just pay the fiver by mail. Or you can also pick up an annual pass for $30 - which, if you go hiking about once a week like I do, works out to a bank-breaking 58 cents per trip.

At first, I wasn’t exactly sure what the ultimate aim of these measures was. To force the government’s hand to fund federal parks and recreation areas the way they’re supposed to? To bolster public interest and attendance in these areas? Or is it to stop the Forest Service from double-charging for access and collecting money instead of spending what it already has responsibly?

Scott at Wild Wilderness reposted an article originally appearing in Fly Rod & Reel magazine that tackles the issue with clarity and depth. They mention the original law was written by Enemy of the Environment Richard Pombo, and was designed to increase vehicular access to wilderness areas, gut the Forest Service of federal funds, and force privatization of the parks.

That wasn’t my first instinct when I read about this program, but given Pombo’s abysmal track record, it’s certainly well within the realm of possibility.

Either way, it’s definitely an issue worth keeping tabs on. Lucky for us, Wild Wilderness is doing a great job of posting lots of updates, information, and analysis on the Recreation Access Tax. Or, as it is now becoming known on the interweb - the RAT.

I like the ring of that.

L.A. River Revitalization

L.A. Observed - an excellent blog on the state of newspaper journalism and other media here in the City of Angels - has a nice video covering a short tour of the L.A. River, courtesy of the Friends of the L.A. River.

It’s a six minute mini-history of the revitalization efforts, very well done and very interesting. Worth checking out - especially if you’re excited about one of the potential Next Great Civil Engineering Projects here in the US of A.




Federal Judge Blocks Mountaintop Removal Ruling

Well, would you look at that?

Federal Judges in West Virginia just overturned an old ruling that made mountaintop removal permits easy to obtain — even without getting an environmental impact statement.

Hopefully, this is the start of a broader investigation into this practice and its effects on the surrounding environment…

Missing Mountains

Google Earth is a great program. You can use for anything from casual sightseeing, browsing a hike, or spying on your neighbors. Now it’s also being used as a visceral visual aid for a continuing environmental tragedy that somehow continues to go unnoticed.

“Mountaintop Removal” is the surprisingly accurate name for a popular type of mining in Appalachia. Basically, to get at coal veins, the top of a mountain is deforested and exploded, with the debris pushed into neighboring valleys. The coal is processed, leaving huge lakes of toxic slurry behind, and then the mine operators plant some non-native vegetation and move on to the next mountain.

Obviously, this causes some problems. Deforestation increases the risk of landslides, and several slurry ponds have burst through their dams or through old mine shafts, wreaking havoc on the communities below them. The 2000 Martin County Sludge Spill contaminated the drinking water of 27,000 people and was 30 times larger than the Exxon Valez spill.

As the push for “clean” coal escalates in the coming years, mountaintop removal is likely to increase … unless more people know about it. And that’s where Google Earth comes in.

I Love Mountains hosts a comprehensive Google Earth “Memorial For the Mountains,” which shows the mountains before and after mountaintop removal mining began. It’s also got detailed information on each mountain, written by local residents, maps of all the sludge dams in the mountains, and an overlay of the larger mining sites on top of major cities — so us urbanites can get a good idea of just how huge these things are. Here’s one of the mines nearly covering the entire island of Manhattan:

Pretty crazy, eh?

And if Google Earth doesn’t float your boat, they’ve also got some Flickr pools of photographic evidence:

Grand Canyon Double-Standards

I’ve been trying to think of a way to talk about the Grand Canyon Skywalk project that’s very close to opening up.

While my gut reaction was to think of it as an abomination on the landscape, Ranger X reminds us not to be so quick to judge. He describes the official National Park grounds as

anything but pristine with houses and pay phones at Phantom Ranch, a water pipeline across the canyon, a bank, an ATM, 11 restaurants, an auto mechanic shop, Internet access, a kennel, a medical clinic, a post office, gas stations, gift shops, six lodges with almost 1000 rooms. There are 228 miles of roads and 1143 buildings. This isn’t “necessary”. It’s excessive and it’s impossible to find solitude on the South Rim.

… and he’s right. I went there over the Thanksgiving weekend with my roommates a few years ago. While we had a great time and found the Canyon unbelievably inspiring and beautiful, X is correct in noting it’s pretty impossible to find solitude there. On the actual day of Thanksgiving, we almost had the park to ourselves. The day after, it felt like we were at a mall.

Of course, on the flip side, just because we’ve screwed up part of the Canyon already doesn’t mean we should keep screwing it up. I guess, when it comes down to the Skywalk:

- I don’t mind that it’s there.
- But I won’t be going to visit it.
- And I very sincerely hope it doesn’t inspire copycat construction.